| Title: | Simple Linear Cancer Risk Prediction Models With Novel Features Outperform Complex Approaches |
| Journal: | JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics |
| Published: | 3 Mar 2022 |
| Pubmed: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35239414/ |
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1200/cci.21.00166 |
| URL: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8920463 |
| Citations: | 2 (2 in last 2 years) as of 8 Aug 2024 |
Publication 7181
WARNING: the interactive features of this website use CSS3, which your browser does not support. To use the full features of this website, please update your browser.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The ability to accurately predict an individual's risk for cancer is critical to the implementation of precision prevention measures. Current cancer risk predictions are frequently made with simple models that use a few proven risk factors, such as the Gail model for breast cancer, which are easy to interpret, but may theoretically be less accurate than advanced machine learning (ML) models.</p>
METHODS: With the UK Biobank, a large prospective study, we developed models that predicted 13 cancer diagnoses within a 10-year time span. ML and linear models fit with all features, linear models fit with 10 features, and externally developed QCancer models, which are available to more than 4,000 general practices, were assessed.</p>
RESULTS: The average area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) of the linear models (0.722, SE = 0.015) was greater than the average AUC of the ML models (0.720, SE = 0.016) when all 931 features were used. Linear models with only 10 features generated an average AUC of 0.706 (SE 0.015), which was comparable to the complex models using all features and greater than the average AUC of the QCancer models (0.684, SE 0.021). The high performance of the 10-feature linear model may be caused by the consideration of often omitted feature types, including census records and genetic information.</p>
CONCLUSION: The high performance of the 10-feature linear models indicate that unbiased selection of diverse features, not ML models, may lead to impressively accurate predictions, possibly enabling personalized screening schedules that increase cancer survival.</p>
4 Authors
- Scott Kulm
- Lior Kofman
- Jason Mezey
- Olivier Elemento
1 Application
| Application ID | Title |
|---|---|
| 47137 | Polygenic Risk Score and Clinical Information Integration for Disease Prediction |
Enabling scientific discoveries that improve human health