| Title: | Factorial Mendelian randomization: using genetic variants to assess interactions |
| Journal: | International Journal of Epidemiology |
| Published: | 1 Aug 2019 |
| Pubmed: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31369124/ |
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyz161 |
| URL: | https://academic.oup.com/ije/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/ije/dyz161/29027971/dyz161.pdf |
Publication 4845
WARNING: the interactive features of this website use CSS3, which your browser does not support. To use the full features of this website, please update your browser.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Factorial Mendelian randomization is the use of genetic variants to answer questions about interactions. Although the approach has been used in applied investigations, little methodological advice is available on how to design or perform a factorial Mendelian randomization analysis. Previous analyses have employed a 2 × 2 approach, using dichotomized genetic scores to divide the population into four subgroups as in a factorial randomized trial.</p>
METHODS: We describe two distinct contexts for factorial Mendelian randomization: investigating interactions between risk factors, and investigating interactions between pharmacological interventions on risk factors. We propose two-stage least squares methods using all available genetic variants and their interactions as instrumental variables, and using continuous genetic scores as instrumental variables rather than dichotomized scores. We illustrate our methods using data from UK Biobank to investigate the interaction between body mass index and alcohol consumption on systolic blood pressure.</p>
RESULTS: Simulated and real data show that efficiency is maximized using the full set of interactions between genetic variants as instruments. In the applied example, between 4- and 10-fold improvement in efficiency is demonstrated over the 2 × 2 approach. Analyses using continuous genetic scores are more efficient than those using dichotomized scores. Efficiency is improved by finding genetic variants that divide the population at a natural break in the distribution of the risk factor, or else divide the population into more equal-sized groups.</p>
CONCLUSIONS: Previous factorial Mendelian randomization analyses may have been underpowered. Efficiency can be improved by using all genetic variants and their interactions as instrumental variables, rather than the 2 × 2 approach.</p>
6 Keywords
- Causality
- Genetic Variation
- Humans
- Least-Squares Analysis
- Mendelian Randomization Analysis
- Risk Factors
3 Authors
- Jessica M B Rees
- Christopher N Foley
- Stephen Burgess
1 Application
| Application ID | Title |
|---|---|
| 7439 | Comparissons of measures of adiposity including body-mass index, waist-circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and percentage body fat mass |
Enabling scientific discoveries that improve human health