Abstract
AIM: The definition of clinical obesity was newly announced. Our study aims to investigate the relationship between different states of obesity and dysfunctions due to obesity with cancer incidence and mortality.</p>
METHODS: The prospective cohort study from the UK Biobank included 220 016 participants. Anthropometric parameters, in combination with obesity-induced dysfunctions, were used to diagnose clinical obesity. Six clusters were categorized according to individual's baseline and follow-up dysfunction status. Hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for cancer incidence risk were estimated using the landmark analysis.</p>
RESULTS: After a mean follow-up period of 11.0 years, a total of 24 066 cancer incidence was observed. Using Cluster 1 (participants without obesity and dysfunction at baseline and during follow-up) as the reference group, Cluster 5 (preclinical obesity with follow-up dysfunctions; HR = 3.17, 95% CI: 3.05-3.29) exhibited the highest multivariable-adjusted cancer incidence risk, while Cluster 4 (preclinical obesity without follow-up dysfunctions; HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.85-0.92) showed the lowest. Additionally, the fully adjusted HRs for cancer mortality showed the highest in Cluster 6 (clinical obesity; HR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.65-2.00), compared with Cluster 1. Site-specific analyses showed consistently higher cancer risks in Cluster 5 and 6 across various types of cancer, notably the incidence of pancreatic cancer and the mortality of prostate or bladder cancer.</p>
CONCLUSION: Obesity-induced dysfunction was significantly associated with cancer risk. For future clinical practice, the early identification and intervention of clinical obesity and obesity-induced dysfunctions are of critical importance for reducing cancer risks.</p>