| Title: | Reassessing lipid-mood disorder associations: The limitations of PCA for nonlinear patterns |
| Journal: | Journal of Affective Disorders |
| Published: | 5 Aug 2025 |
| Pubmed: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40774511/ |
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2025.120024 |
Publication 16312
WARNING: the interactive features of this website use CSS3, which your browser does not support. To use the full features of this website, please update your browser.
Abstract
Liu et al. (2025) analyzed UK Biobank data, using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to identify lipid patterns associated with depression and bipolar disorder. Their work reported that the first principal component (PC1), reflecting Apolipoprotein B (ApoB), cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), showed a protective effect against depression. However, their methodological approach warrants discussion. PCA is a linear dimensionality reduction technique. The authors noted nonlinear relationships between lipid profiles and mood disorder risk, contradicting PCA's inherent linearity assumption. Applying linear methods like PCA to nonlinear data can lead to significant distortions, systematic bias, and underfitting, failing to capture true data complexity. PC1 may have obscured genuine associations by forcing distinct biological features into a single linear equation, potentially diluting crucial signals. For future research, complementing PCA with unsupervised learning techniques like Feature Agglomeration (FA) and Highly Variable Gene Selection (HVGS) could offer a more robust approach. Additionally, using nonlinear nonparametric statistical methods such as Spearman's rho or Kendall's tau would be beneficial. These methods detect monotonic relationships without linearity assumptions, precisely capturing potentially nonlinear associations and enhancing interpretability in translational biomarker research.</p>
3 Authors
- Soki Ogawa
- Souichi Oka
- Yoshiyasu Takefuji
Enabling scientific discoveries that improve human health