| Title: | Understanding variability in brain MRI templates: Optimal sample sizes for representative population averages |
| Journal: | Aperture Neuro |
| Published: | 10 Mar 2025 |
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.52294/001c.130075 |
| Title: | Understanding variability in brain MRI templates: Optimal sample sizes for representative population averages |
| Journal: | Aperture Neuro |
| Published: | 10 Mar 2025 |
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.52294/001c.130075 |
WARNING: the interactive features of this website use CSS3, which your browser does not support. To use the full features of this website, please update your browser.
Average anatomical brain templates are routinely used in neuroanatomical and functional studies. Several widely used anatomical models were historically constructed with different algorithms and a limited number of subjects. We performed an experiment to determine the number of subjects required to achieve a stable population average and to estimate variability in individual subjects' registration. We used a random subset of 2000 subjects from the UK Biobank (between 40 and 60 years of age) to generate a "silver standard" population average and then ran a template generation process with a variable number of subjects from 10 to 320, repeating each draw 50 times in a bootstrapping fashion. We compared two methods which are widely used in the literature to generate population averages (ANIMAL and ANTs). Our results showed that 160 subjects are enough to generate a stable population average, and both methods achieve comparable results, with ANTs having advantage over ANIMAL when a smaller number of subjects are available.</p>
| Application ID | Title |
|---|---|
| 45551 | Mechanistic modelling of neurodevelopment, neuroplasticity, and neurodegeneration |
Enabling scientific discoveries that improve human health