| Title: | Repeat Measures of Lipoprotein(a) Molar Concentration and Cardiovascular Risk |
| Journal: | Journal of the American College of Cardiology |
| Published: | 1 Feb 2022 |
| Pubmed: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35177190/ |
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.11.055 |
Publication 13862
WARNING: the interactive features of this website use CSS3, which your browser does not support. To use the full features of this website, please update your browser.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: When indicated, guidelines recommend measurement of lipoprotein(a) for cardiovascular risk assessment. However, temporal variability in lipoprotein(a) is not well understood, and it is unclear if repeat testing may help refine risk prediction of coronary artery disease (CAD).</p>
OBJECTIVES: The authors examined the stability of repeat lipoprotein(a) measurements and the association between instability in lipoprotein(a) molar concentration with incident CAD.</p>
METHODS: The authors assessed the correlation between baseline and first follow-up measurements of lipoprotein(a) in the UK Biobank (n = 16,017 unrelated individuals). The association between change in lipoprotein(a) molar concentration and incident CAD was assessed among 15,432 participants using Cox proportional hazards models.</p>
RESULTS: Baseline and follow-up lipoprotein(a) molar concentration were significantly correlated over a median of 4.42 years (IQR: 3.69-4.93 years; Spearman rho = 0.96; P < 0.0001). The correlation between baseline and follow-up lipoprotein(a) molar concentration were stable across time between measurements of <3 (rho = 0.96), 3-4 (rho = 0.97), 4-5 (rho = 0.96), and >5 years (rho = 0.96). Although there were negligible-to-modest associations between statin use and changes in lipoprotein(a) molar concentration, statin usage was associated with a significant increase in lipoprotein(a) among individuals with baseline levels ≥70 nmol/L. Follow-up lipoprotein(a) molar concentration was significantly associated with risk of incident CAD (HR per 120 nmol/L: 1.32 [95% CI: 1.16-1.50]; P = 0.0002). However, the delta between follow-up and baseline lipoprotein(a) molar concentration was not significantly associated with incident CAD independent of follow-up lipoprotein(a) (P = 0.98).</p>
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that, in the absence of therapies substantially altering lipoprotein(a), a single accurate measurement of lipoprotein(a) molar concentration is an efficient method to inform CAD risk.</p>
14 Keywords
- Adult
- Aged
- Biomarkers
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Cohort Studies
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Heart Disease Risk Factors
- Humans
- Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
- Lipoprotein(a)
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Prospective Studies
8 Authors
- Mark Trinder
- Kaavya Paruchuri
- Sara Haidermota
- Rachel Bernardo
- Seyedeh Maryam Zekavat
- Thomas Gilliland
- James Januzzi
- Pradeep Natarajan
1 Application
| Application ID | Title |
|---|---|
| 7089 | Exome Sequencing of All Premature Coronary Artery Disease Participants in UK Biobank |
Enabling scientific discoveries that improve human health