Title: | Habitual use of glucosamine and adverse liver outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes and MASLD |
Journal: | Liver International |
Published: | 6 Jun 2024 |
Pubmed: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38842441/ |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.16001 |
Title: | Habitual use of glucosamine and adverse liver outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes and MASLD |
Journal: | Liver International |
Published: | 6 Jun 2024 |
Pubmed: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38842441/ |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.16001 |
WARNING: the interactive features of this website use CSS3, which your browser does not support. To use the full features of this website, please update your browser.
BACKGROUND: Glucosamine is a dietary supplement commonly used to support joint health. However, there has been interest in exploring other effects of glucosamine on health outcomes due to its ant-inflammation effect.</p>
OBJECTIVE: This study compared the risks of major adverse liver outcomes (MALOs) between regular users and non-users of glucosamine among patients with type 2 diabetes and metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) using the data from a large prospective cohort study.</p>
METHODS: Demographic, anthropometric, laboratory and medication prescription information among 18 753 patients with type 2 diabetes and MASLD was obtained from the UK Biobank. MASLD was identified based on hepatic steatosis defined by fatty liver index ≥60 plus the presence of any clues of metabolic dysregulation and cardio-metabolic risk factors, excluding patients with moderate to severe alcohol consumption.</p>
RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 11.4 years, 826 incident MALOs events were recorded. Patients not regularly using glucosamine compared with patients using glucosamine showed a significantly higher risk of the composite MALOs (HR 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.69) as well as most individual MALOs except for ascites. The multivariable-adjusted HRs of MALOs within 3, 5 and 10 years among non-users of glucosamine compared with regular users were 1.79 (95% CI .69-2.03), 1.88 (95% CI 1.21-2.54) and 1.32 (95% CI 1.05-1.72), respectively. Further subgroup analyses in participants with different baseline characteristics and sensitivity analyses excluding participants who regularly took any other supplements and participants who used self-reports to diagnose diabetes confirmed the findings.</p>
CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicated that habitual use of glucosamine was associated with a low risk of individual and composite MALOs among patients with type 2 diabetes and MASLD.</p>
Enabling scientific discoveries that improve human health