| Title: | External Validation of Risk Prediction Models Incorporating Common Genetic Variants for Incident Colorectal Cancer Using UK Biobank |
| Journal: | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Published: | 1 Jun 2020 |
| Pubmed: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32071122/ |
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.capr-19-0521 |
| URL: | https://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/content/canprevres/13/6/509.full.pdf |
| Citations: | 26 (9 in last 2 years) as of 8 Aug 2024 |
Publication 3643
WARNING: the interactive features of this website use CSS3, which your browser does not support. To use the full features of this website, please update your browser.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare and externally validate risk scores developed to predict incident colorectal cancer that include common genetic variants (SNPs), with or without established lifestyle/environmental (questionnaire-based/classical/phenotypic) risk factors. We externally validated 23 risk models from a previous systematic review in 443,888 participants ages 37 to 73 from the UK Biobank cohort who had 6-year prospective follow-up, no prior history of colorectal cancer, and data for incidence of colorectal cancer through linkage to national cancer registries. There were 2,679 (0.6%) cases of incident colorectal cancer. We assessed model discrimination using the area under the operating characteristic curve (AUC) and relative risk calibration. The AUC of models including only SNPs increased with the number of included SNPs and was similar in men and women: the model by Huyghe with 120 SNPs had the highest AUC of 0.62 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.59-0.64] in women and 0.64 (95% CI, 0.61-0.66) in men. Adding phenotypic risk factors without age improved discrimination in men but not in women. Adding phenotypic risk factors and age increased discrimination in all cases (P < 0.05), with the best performing models including SNPs, phenotypic risk factors, and age having AUCs between 0.64 and 0.67 in women and 0.67 and 0.71 in men. Relative risk calibration varied substantially across the models. Among middle-aged people in the UK, existing polygenic risk scores discriminate moderately well between those who do and do not develop colorectal cancer over 6 years. Consideration should be given to exploring the feasibility of incorporating genetic and lifestyle/environmental information in any future stratified colorectal cancer screening program.</p>
18 Keywords
- Adult
- Age Factors
- Aged
- Area Under Curve
- Biological Specimen Banks
- Colorectal Neoplasms
- Ethnicity
- Female
- Humans
- Incidence
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Models, Genetic
- Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
- Registries
- Risk
- Sex Factors
- United Kingdom
11 Authors
- Catherine L. Saunders
- Britt Kilian
- Deborah J. Thompson
- Luke J. McGeoch
- Simon J. Griffin
- Antonis C. Antoniou
- Jon D. Emery
- Fiona M. Walter
- Joe Dennis
- Xin Yang
- Juliet A. Usher-Smith
1 Application
| Application ID | Title |
|---|---|
| 28126 | Validating risk prediction models for common hormonal cancers |
Enabling scientific discoveries that improve human health