| Title: | Genetic determinants of polygenic prediction accuracy within a population |
| Journal: | Genetics |
| Published: | 17 Oct 2022 |
| Pubmed: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36250789/ |
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyac158 |
| URL: | https://academic.oup.com/genetics/article-pdf/222/4/iyac158/47467344/iyac158.pdf |
| Citations: | 6 (5 in last 2 years) as of 8 Aug 2024 |
Publication 10600
WARNING: the interactive features of this website use CSS3, which your browser does not support. To use the full features of this website, please update your browser.
Abstract
Genomic risk prediction is on the emerging path toward personalized medicine. However, the accuracy of polygenic prediction varies strongly in different individuals. Based on up to 352,277 European ancestry participants in the UK Biobank, we constructed polygenic risk scores for 15 physiological and biochemical quantitative traits. We identified a total of 185 polygenic prediction variability quantitative trait loci for 11 traits by Levene's test among 254,376 unrelated individuals. We validated the effects of prediction variability quantitative trait loci using an independent test set of 58,927 individuals. For instance, a score aggregating 51 prediction variability quantitative trait locus variants for triglycerides had the strongest Spearman correlation of 0.185 (P-value <1.0 × 10-300) with the squared prediction errors. We found a strong enrichment of complex genetic effects conferred by prediction variability quantitative trait loci compared to risk loci identified in genome-wide association studies, including 89 prediction variability quantitative trait loci exhibiting dominance effects. Incorporation of dominance effects into polygenic risk scores significantly improved polygenic prediction for triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, vitamin D, and platelet. In conclusion, we have discovered and profiled genetic determinants of polygenic prediction variability for 11 quantitative biomarkers. These findings may assist interpretation of genomic risk prediction in various contexts and encourage novel approaches for constructing polygenic risk scores with complex genetic effects.</p>
4 Authors
- Tianyuan Lu
- Vincenzo Forgetta
- John Brent Richards
- Celia M T Greenwood
Enabling scientific discoveries that improve human health